At Experion, we help organizations build software that is not only functional but secure from the ground up – including every dependency and third-party component that goes into it.
Modern software does not exist in isolation. It comprises hundreds of components and tools, most of which weren’t written by your team. This is what makes software supply chain security an urgent challenge in technology today.
From the SolarWinds breach that shook governments worldwide to the Log4j vulnerability, the message is clear- attackers can simply walk in through a trusted vendor or a compromised build pipeline. This blog explains what software supply chain security means in 2026, the extent of risks involved, and what you can do to ensure that your organization is protected.
Key Takeaways
- The software supply chain covers every piece of code, tool, and process involved in building and distributing software – including plenty of components your team never wrote and may not even know about.
- Supply chain attacks grew 742% between 2019 and 2022. The trend hasn’t slowed down.
- Perimeter-based security wasn’t built for threats that arrive through trusted pipelines and vendor relationships. It won’t catch them reliably.
- A solid supply chain security framework covers SBOMs, dependency management, pipeline hardening, code signing, and zero-trust principles — not as isolated controls, but as a connected program.
- US Executive Order 14028, NIST SSDF, and the EU Cyber Resilience Act are turning supply chain security from a best practice into a legal requirement. That shift is already underway.
- Security built in from the start works. Security bolted on at the end of the development lifecycle mostly doesn’t.
What Is Software Supply Chain Security?
In manufacturing, a supply chain comprises suppliers, manufacturers, intermediaries, and distributors that bring a product to market. Software, too, has a supply chain. But unlike manufacturing, it is complex. It involves each code, each tool, process, right down to the people who produce and deliver software. This includes:
- Internal code or first-party code
- The open-source libraries are pulled from npm or PyPI.
- Third-party SDKs (Software Development Kits) are pre-built libraries or tools created by external companies. Developers integrate the SDK into their applications. Eg: Payment or Authentication SDKs.
- Build Tools: Compiles your code into a runnable application. Eg: Maven, Gradle, etc.
- CI/CD Pipelines: CI/CD stands for Continuous Integration / Continuous Deployment. These pipelines automatically build and deploy software whenever developers push any type of code changes. Eg: Jenkins, GitHub Actions, etc.
- Container Images: Modern applications are packaged as containers. This includes the application and everything it needs to run. Eg: Docker Images, Kubernetes containers
- Cloud Infrastructure: The environment where the application runs. It provides the essential servers, networking, Databases, security controls, etc.
Modern software is comprised of many interconnected tools and services. Software supply chain security refers to the processes and policies that safeguard every stage of software distribution.
Why Software Supply Chain Security Matters?
The average modern application has more than 500 third-party components. Each component is a potential entry point for an attacker. According to Sonatype, a software supply chain management provider, supply chain attacks grew to 742% between 2019 and 2022. This is an upward trend.
How the Software Supply Chain Works?
Stages in the Software Supply Chain
Here are the different stages in the software supply chain, where security decisions matter.
- Code creation: The starting point, where developers write application logic. Security at this stage involves enforcing secure coding standards and conducting peer reviews. Programmers also need to check that AI-generated code does not introduce any vulnerabilities or dependencies.
- Dependency integration-This is where the supply chain risk becomes most visible. During development, developers integrate a wide range of open-source libraries and third-party packages. Each dependency, in turn, brings its own dependencies.
- Build and compilation– Build environments are where source code is compiled into executable software. These environments are high-value targets, allowing attackers to modify software without ever touching the source code.
- Testing and validation-Should include not just functional tests but security scans – static analysis, software composition analysis, secret detection, and container image scanning.
- Packaging and distribution– At this stage, there is a risk to artifact integrity. How do consumers know that the package they download is the one you built and not a tampered copy?
- Deployment and updates– Some Attackers can inject malicious code into an update, allowing them to gain access to every system that trusts automatic updates.
Where Security Risks Enter the Supply Chain?
Security risks can enter the software supply chain at any stage. It can happen in subtle ways that are difficult to detect.
Third Party Dependency: Developers depend on external libraries and frameworks to speed up their development cycles. However, if a vulnerability exists in a widely used open-source package, that weakness can cascade through thousands of applications that depend on it.
Build Environment: Another major risk lies in the build environment. Attackers can alter compiled outputs without altering the source code if they obtain access to the build infrastructure. As a result, even though the deployed program contains harmful alterations, the repository may appear clean.
Code contribution: Threats may also be introduced through the code contribution process. Attackers may use compromised maintainer accounts to submit malicious updates that end up in official releases, or they may pose as legitimate pull requests in collaborative development settings.
Typical strategies include typosquatting and package namespace hijacking. To introduce a harmful dependency into the project via a simple typo during installation, attackers construct packages with names that resemble trustworthy libraries.
Lax access constraints further increase supply chain hazards. Another crucial attack surface is the CI/CD pipeline. Attackers can insert malicious code directly into production releases by exploiting systems that automate development, testing, and deployment.
Lastly, cloud infrastructure and containers provide more levels of risk. Applications, data, and deployment systems may be vulnerable to unwanted access due to vulnerable container images or improperly configured cloud settings.
Why “Software Security” is No Longer Enough?
- The Shift in Attack Surface: For many years, software security in the supply chain focused on hardening applications. This meant patching vulnerabilities and hardening authentication. But today’s attackers won’t break through your defenses. Instead, they work inside them. They target the build process, package repositories, CI/CD pipelines, and trusted vendors whose software already has a seat at your table.
- Legacy vs. Modern Supply Chain Security: A traditional firewall can block any unauthorised connection. An endpoint agent can alert you to any suspicious executable. But none of these controls will ever stop a poisoned npm package that a developer installs from a public registry, since it enters the system through a legitimate way. This is where software supply chain security stands out-it ensures that nothing malicious enters, even through trusted channels.
- The “Shai-Hulud” Worm & SolarWinds Legacy: Traditional cyberattacks often focused on a company’s infrastructure. Supplychain attacks follow a different approach – they compromise a trusted upstream component, allowing the malware to propagate naturally. This could be a library, dependency repository, or a build server.
The recent Shai-Hulud worm incident involved a self-propagating malware worm that attacked around 500 npm packages. Once installed, they can steal sensitive data, such as tokens and keys. It forces compromised developers to push malicious updates into their own software packages. The Shai-hulud and SolarWinds cyber threats highlight the need to secure the entire supply chain.
Common Software Supply Chain Vulnerabilities
Compromised Open-Source Libraries
Public registries like npm, PyPI, and RubyGems are heavily targeted precisely because developers trust them. Typosquatting catches developers who mistype a package name. Dependency confusion attacks are more sophisticated, exploiting how package managers resolve names to pull attacker-controlled packages instead of legitimate internal ones. Both techniques work because they abuse trust that’s largely taken for granted.
Insecure Build Pipelines
CI/CD pipelines weren’t originally designed with adversarial resistance in mind -they were built for speed. That’s a problem now that they’ve become a primary target of attack. A compromised pipeline can inject malicious code into builds, exfiltrate secrets, or tamper with artifacts after they’ve already passed security scans.
Dependency Vulnerabilities
Outdated dependencies sitting untouched in a codebase can carry known software supply chain vulnerabilities for months without anyone noticing. Transitive dependencies – the dependencies of your dependencies – are the bigger blind spot. Without dedicated tooling, they’re largely invisible, which makes them an attractive target.
Insider Threats
Not every supply chain risk comes from outside. Developers, DevOps engineers, and contractors with repository and pipeline access can introduce vulnerabilities through negligence or intent – unauthorized code changes, privilege abuse, secrets accidentally committed to version control.
Compromised Software Updates
Auto-update mechanisms are necessary for patching quickly, but they’re also a trusted channel that attackers actively exploit. Inject malicious code into an update mechanism, and every system configured to auto-update becomes a vector. SolarWinds is the obvious example, but it’s not an isolated one.
Malicious AI-Generated & AI-Assisted Code Risks
This one is newer and worth paying attention to. AI coding assistants sometimes hallucinate package names that don’t actually exist, and attackers are registering those names on public registries in advance, waiting for developers to install them. The technique has been called “slopsquatting,” and it’s a genuinely new vulnerability class that most traditional scanning tools weren’t built to catch.
Lessons from Major Software Supply Chain Attacks
SolarWinds Attack
In 2020, attackers later attributed to Russian intelligence compromised SolarWinds’ build pipeline, an IT monitoring vendor with a large enterprise customer base. They inserted a backdoor -dubbed SUNBURST – into legitimate software updates for the Orion platform. Because the updates were signed and distributed through official channels, around 18,000 organizations installed them without suspicion. Victims included the US Departments of Treasury, Homeland Security, and State. The attack went undetected for months.
Log4j Vulnerability
In December 2021, a critical vulnerability in Log4j, a Java logging library embedded in hundreds of millions of systems worldwide, was disclosed. CVE-2021-44228 allowed remote code execution with minimal effort on the attacker’s part. The bigger problem was that most organizations had no idea they were running Log4j at all — it was buried in transitive dependencies several layers deep, invisible without dedicated tooling.
Log4j made the case for SBOM requirements more effectively than any policy argument ever had.
CodeCov Breach
Also in 2021, attackers compromised Codecov, a widely used code coverage tool in CI/CD pipelines. By modifying Codecov’s bash uploader script, they silently harvested environment variables – secrets, credentials, tokens -from every pipeline that ran the tool. The breach affected some significant technology companies before it was caught.
It’s a clear illustration of how third-party tooling in your pipeline poses real risk, regardless of how routine or trusted it seems.
Key Lessons from These Attacks
- Supply chain security software should cover not just application dependencies, but also build tools and CI/CD integrations.
- Cryptographic verification of every artifact in the pipeline is non-negotiable.
- The blast radius of a single compromised vendor can reach thousands of downstream organizations simultaneously.
Major Components of a Software Supply Chain Security Framework
Secure Development Practices
An appropriate Software Supply chain security framework needs to be built into development from the start. That means secure coding standards, threat modeling during design, peer review for sensitive changes, and developer training that covers supply chain-specific risks, including the growing category of AI-assisted code risks.
Dependency Management
You can’t manage what you can’t see. Effective dependency management means automated tracking of all third-party components, regular updates to address known vulnerabilities, and an SBOM that gives you a complete, machine-readable inventory of everything in your application.
Identity and Access Management
Every identity – human or non-human – should have only the permissions it actually needs. That applies to source code repositories, CI/CD pipelines, package registries, and deployment systems. Permissions should be reviewed and rotated regularly, not granted once and forgotten.
Continuous Monitoring
A dependency that was clean yesterday can have a critical CVE today. Automated vulnerability scanning needs to run continuously across your entire dependency tree, not just at commit time, with real-time alerts when anything changes.
Secure Build and Deployment Pipelines
Pipelines are infrastructure, and they need to be treated that way. Signed builds, verified package integrity, ephemeral build environments, and enforced approval gates for pipeline changes are the baseline – not nice-to-haves.
Secrets Management
Hardcoded secrets in source code or pipeline config are a well-known, entirely avoidable vulnerability. Vault-based solutions such as HashiCorp Vault, AWS Secrets Manager, and Azure Key Vault securely store secrets, enforce access controls, and maintain audit trails. Nothing sensitive belongs in version control.
Experion works with software teams to build supply chain security programs that are operational and not just compliant on paper.
The SBOM Imperative: You Can’t Secure What You Can’t See
An SBOM is essentially an ingredients list for your software: A structured, machine-readable inventory of every component in an application, including open-source libraries, commercial packages, their versions, licenses, and known vulnerabilities.
Tools like Syft, CycloneDX, or any SPDX-compatible tooling can generate them automatically as part of every build, which is how they should be produced. The real-world value shows up fast when something like Log4j hits – organizations with current SBOMs can query their inventory in minutes and know exactly where they’re exposed. Those without one are looking at days of manual digging, often under pressure.
Essential Software Supply Chain Security Tools
Software Composition Analysis (SCA) Tools
SCA tools like Snyk, FOSSA, and Dependabot – scan your codebase and dependency trees for vulnerable packages, outdated libraries, and license issues. Hook them into your IDE and your CI/CD pipeline. Finding a vulnerable dependency at commit time is a five-minute fix. Finding it in production is a much longer conversation.
Container Security Tools
Trivy, Grype, and Anchore scan container images before they reach deployment. Worth having even if you’re already running application-layer scanning – containers carry OS packages and runtime dependencies that most app-level tools won’t touch.
CI/CD Security Tools
Tekton Chains, GitHub Actions with OIDC token binding, GitLab’s supply chain features – these exist because pipelines get compromised too. Signing, provenance attestation, and separation of duties inside the pipeline aren’t overkill. They’re just good practice, given how attractive build infrastructure has become as an attack target.
Artifact Integrity Verification Tools
Sigstore’s Cosign gives you cryptographic proof that an artifact hasn’t been touched between build and deployment. If something does get tampered with, you’ll know. If you’re not doing this yet, it’s worth prioritizing.
Dependency Monitoring Tools
Software supply chain security tools such as Dependabot, Renovate, and Socket.dev watch your dependency ecosystem around the clock. New CVE drops on a package you’re running? You hear about it quickly, rather than waiting until a customer does.
Policy Enforcement & Supply Chain Platforms
Chainguard, Scribe Security, and the Kusari platform pull together provenance tracking, policy enforcement, and vulnerability management under one roof -useful if you’re trying to get a consolidated view rather than stitching together point solutions. Running Kubernetes? OPA Gatekeeper and Kyverno enforce security policies at runtime before anything is actually deployed.
Build software that your customers can trust- from the first line of code to the final release.
The 2026 Supply Chain Security Software Framework
- SLSA (Supply-chain Levels for Software Artifacts): The gold standard for ensuring artifact integrity. The four-level maturity model gives teams a practical progression path – from basic source control all the way to fully hermetic, independently verifiable builds. If you’re not sure where to start with supply chain security frameworks, SLSA is usually the right answer.
- NIST SSDF (Secure Software Development Framework): Required reading if you work with US federal contractors, and increasingly showing up in commercial contracts too. Its four practice groups map cleanly to supply chain security disciplines, making it useful as a structured baseline even outside the federal context.
- OWASP Top 10 (2025 Update): The 2025 update includes “A03: Software and Data Integrity Failures” as a dedicated category. That’s not a small thing: it signals that supply chain integrity has moved from a niche concern to a mainstream application security priority.
- Zero Trust for Code: Same principle as network zero trust, applied to dependencies and third-party scripts.
- OpenSSF Scorecard & OpenSSF Best Practices Badge: Automated security health scoring for open-source projects. Useful when you’re evaluating a new dependency and want something more objective than gut feel – it surfaces maintainer activity, vulnerability response history, and other signals worth knowing before you commit.
- EU Cyber Resilience Act (CRA) – Binding security requirements for software sold in Europe, including vulnerability disclosure obligations and SBOM mandates. Phased enforcement starts in 2027, which sounds far off until you factor in how long it actually takes to build compliant processes from scratch.
Software Supply Chain Security Best Practices
Maintain a Software Bill of Materials (SBOM)
Generate SBOMs automatically on every build and treat them as living documents, not quarterly snapshots. Integrate them into your vulnerability response workflows and share them with customers who ask. An unused SBOM isn’t protecting you from much.
Vet Third-Party Vendors
Any vendor whose software touches your supply chain needs some level of security assessment — how much depends on their risk level. Review their practices, require evidence of certifications, put security requirements in contracts, and revisit their posture periodically. Vendor risk doesn’t stay static after onboarding.
Secure CI/CD Pipelines
Treat pipeline configuration as security-critical code. Implement approval gates, use ephemeral build environments, pin dependencies, restrict credentials to least privilege, and generate provenance attestations on every build. Pipelines are a well-documented target for attackers – often trusted implicitly and monitored loosely.
Automate Vulnerability Scanning
Manual reviews don’t scale. Integrate SCA, container scanning, secret detection, and IaC scanning into your pipeline, with severity thresholds that automatically block deployments. Critical issues should be caught before production, not after.
Implement Zero Trust Security
Don’t extend implicit trust to anything based on history or familiarity. Every identity gets authenticated, every action authorized, every artifact verified. A compromised dependency shouldn’t move freely through your environment just because it looks legitimate.
Enforce Code Signing
Sign every build artifact and verify signatures before deployment. It makes tampering detectable and gives you a clear chain of custody – one of those controls that feels like overhead until it catches something..
Establish an open source governance program
Define criteria for evaluating package health. It may include maintenance activities, contributor diversity, and security response history, and build a clear approval process around them. When a previously trusted package becomes a liability, having that process in place means you can move quickly.
Achieving End to End Supply Chain Security
Integrating Security Across the Development Lifecycle
End-to-end supply chain security means embedding controls at every stage of development, not bolting them on at the end. Shift-left moves security earlier in the process, where vulnerabilities are cheaper to fix. DevSecOps takes it further -security tooling becomes part of the developer process rather than a separate audit that happens downstream.
Maturity Model: Where Does Your Organization Stand?
Level 1 – Ad Hoc: You are at this level if you have no consistent practices and security is reactive. No SBOMs or any pipeline integrity controls.
Level 2 – Developing: If your organisation has Basic SCA scanning in place and some dependency tracking it falls under Level 2. Patch processes exist but are informal.
Level 3 – Defined: The SBOMs are generated consistently and pipeline security controls implemented. Secrets management in place. Vendor security requirements documented.
Level 4 – Managed: Continuous monitoring across the full dependency tree. Provenance attestation for builds. Formal vendor risk program. Automated policy enforcement in pipelines.
Level 5 – Optimized: Full SLSA Level 3+ compliance. Automated SBOM sharing with customers. Continuous compliance monitoring. Proactive threat intelligence integration.
Most organizations fall somewhere between Level 2 and Level 3. That’s a reasonable starting point – the goal is steady progress, not an overnight overhaul.
Ensuring Visibility Across the Entire Supply Chain
Visibility is the foundation of supply chain security. You can’t protect what you can’t see. That means knowing every component that enters your applications and understanding how those components move through your pipelines.
In practice, that covers a lot of ground: open-source dependencies, internal libraries, container images, build infrastructure, artifact repositories. SBOMs are the most practical tool for maintaining that inventory in a structured, up-to-date state. But visibility doesn’t stop at the application layer.
Continuous Risk Assessment
Supply chain risk doesn’t sit still. New vulnerabilities get disclosed constantly, vendor postures shift, and fresh dependencies enter your codebase every sprint. Automated tooling handles the volume; regular human review catches what automation misses. Both matter.
Automated Security Policies
Automation is necessary for maintaining security. Security policies need to be embedded directly into the CI/CD pipelines so that vulnerable dependencies cannot progress through the development process. Automated security gates can enforce requirements such as dependency vulnerability thresholds, verified build artifacts, signed commits, and secrets scanning. If a policy violation occurs, the pipeline automatically blocks the build until the issue is resolved.
Incident Response for Software Supply Chain Breaches
Detection: How to Know You’ve Been Compromised
Supply chain compromises are harder to detect than direct attacks – the malicious code often arrives through a trusted channel. Watch for unexpected changes in build outputs, unsigned or unverified artifacts, anomalous pipeline behavior, and dependency updates you didn’t initiate. Automated monitoring catches most of this, but your team needs to know what normal looks like before they can spot what isn’t.
Containment: Stopping the Blast Radius
Move fast here. Halt affected pipelines, freeze artifact promotion to production, and revoke compromised credentials immediately. Rotate all secrets associated with affected systems, isolate the affected builds, and roll back to the last known-good signed artifact. The goal is to limit how far the compromise has spread while you figure out what actually happened.
Investigation & Forensics
Your SBOMs and provenance attestations earn their keep here. Use them to trace exactly which builds were affected and when. Audit pipeline logs, access logs, and commit history to reconstruct the full attack timeline. Preserve evidence early and loop in legal and compliance teams before you need them, not after. Regulatory notification obligations have deadlines that don’t care how busy your incident response team is.
Customer Notification & Recovery
GDPR requires breach notification within 72 hours. US state laws vary, but they move fast, too. When communicating with customers, be specific: what was affected, what you’ve done about it, and what they should do. Vague reassurances tend to erode trust faster than the incident itself.
Compliance and Regulatory Requirements for Supply Chain Security
Emerging Government Regulations
The regulatory landscape has become more stringent, with rising security threats. Federal Software vendors need to meet SBOM requirements and adopt NIST SSDF, as per US Executive Order 14028. In Europe, the EU Cyber Resilience Act introduced product-level security for software. This included mandatory vulnerability disclosure and transparency for SBOMs.
Moreover, frameworks like ISO/IEC 27036 and national cybersecurity strategies are incorporating supply chain requirements.
Importance of Compliance for Businesses
Businesses must note that compliance is not just about avoiding regulatory penalties. Organisations with robust supply chain security software can effectively protect customer data and demonstrate their trustworthiness to potential buyers.
Future Trends in Software Supply Chain Security
AI-Powered Security Monitoring
AI and ML are increasingly being applied to supply chain security monitoring. It can pinpoint suspicious code patterns and detect anomalous package behaviour.
In addition, it can correlate threat signals across large ecosystems faster than any analyst can predict.
Increased Adoption of SBOMs
SBOM adoption is increasing, mainly driven by regulatory requirements. Businesses can expect SBOMs to become the standard, given the demonstrated value of rapid vulnerability response enabled by SBOMs.
Automated DevSecOps Pipelines
Security automation inside CI/CD pipelines is only going to get more sophisticated. Policy-as-code, automated remediation, and AI-assisted triage are already reducing the manual workload on security teams.
Stronger Regulatory Oversight
Regulatory requirements will continue to expand globally. Organizations that build compliance into their development processes now will be better positioned for the requirements that are still coming.
Third-Party & Vendor Risk Management in the Software Supply Chain
Tiering Vendors by Risk
Here’s something many security teams skip: not all vendors deserve the same level of scrutiny. Treating a mission-critical SaaS platform the same way you treat a low-touch analytics tool is a waste of everyone’s time. It means your real risks aren’t getting the attention they need.
A simple three-tier model works well in practice.
- Tier 1 refers to high-stakes vendors – deep system access, significant data exposure, or anything that would cause serious damage if it went sideways.
- Tier 2 is moderate risk.
- Tier 3 is the low-integration, limited-exposure relationships where a lighter touch is genuinely fine.
The point isn’t to create bureaucracy. It’s to ensure your Tier 1 vendors receive comprehensive assessments, enforceable contractual obligations, and ongoing monitoring.
Contractual Security Requirements
Security requirements that live outside the contract aren’t really requirements. They’re suggestions. And vendors, understandably, tend to prioritize legally binding obligations over informal expectations.
For Tier 1 vendors, that means getting specific in writing: SBOM provision, vulnerability disclosure timelines, incident notification obligations, and audit rights. If a vendor pushes back hard on any of those, it’s worth paying attention. It tells you something.
Continuous Vendor Monitoring
The assessment you did 18 months ago isn’t protecting you today. Vendors get acquired. Security teams get gutted. Certifications lapse. A vendor that looked solid during onboarding can look very different after a rough year.
Ongoing monitoring, such as threat intelligence feeds, periodic reassessments, and tracking public vulnerability disclosures, keeps your vendor risk picture grounded in reality rather than paperwork. It’s not glamorous work, but it’s the kind of thing that catches problems before they become incidents.
10 point Quick Start Checklist
Some of these will take a few months. Some will take longer. Either way, starting somewhere beats waiting for the perfect moment.
- Generate your first SBOM for your highest-risk application. Find out what your top 10 open-source dependencies actually are.
- Run an SCA scan and fix the critical and high-severity vulnerabilities first. Don’t let perfect be the enemy of good here.
- Audit your CI/CD pipelines. Who can actually modify them? Are those credentials scoped to least privilege, or has that drifted over time?
- Get hardcoded secrets out of version control. Move them to a vault. This one has bitten too many teams to ignore.
- Pin your dependency versions. Unexpected updates are an underrated source of supply chain risk.
- Build your vendor tier list. Even a rough first draft is more useful than nothing.
- Implement code signing for release artifacts and verify signatures before deployment. If you’re not doing this, you’re trusting the pipeline completely.
- Set up continuous vulnerability monitoring so new CVEs don’t go unnoticed until someone manually checks.
- Write your incident response playbook for a supply chain compromise — specifically. Generic IR plans tend to fall apart when the scenario gets specific.
- Take an honest look at your SLSA maturity. Where are you now, and where do you want to be in a year?
Conclusion: Securing Your Software Supply Chain Starts Now
Every year, software supply chains get more tangled, more interconnected, and more attractive to attackers. That’s not speculation. Instead, it’s been the pattern for years running, and there’s no sign of it reversing.
The “we’ll deal with it later” approach has a real cost. It just doesn’t show up on a balance sheet until something goes wrong. Every unmonitored pipeline and every unpinned dependency is a small bet that nothing bad happens. Those bets compound.
The good news is that most organizations aren’t starting from zero. You probably already have pieces of this. The goal is to make it systematic -a consistent operational discipline rather than a scramble after the fact.
The teams that get this right don’t do it because it’s required. They do it because they understand what’s actually at stake when the trust of their customers and partners is on the line. That’s a stronger motivator than any compliance checkbox.
At Experion, we partner with technology organizations to build security into the fabric of software development. Ranging from architecture and secure coding practices to supply chain controls and DevSecOps integration. If you’re ready to strengthen your software security in the supply chain, we’re ready to help.